Monday, September 10, 2007

A definition of the word art

(I would like to thank everyone who has waited so long for a new post and continued to visit Crateartist.com)

















My friend Noel just got married yesterday. Weddings are special events, they are points in time where many people come and reflect their lives, change their lives, see their lives, and remember their lives. They are like reverse explosions, so many lives coming to a single point. I do not see how anyone can witness such an event and be the same person afterward.


Reflecting, I see that the people who surrounded me in New York are sorely missed. The artists and musicians I constantly socialized with are 2000 miles away and there is no one here, in Florida, to replace them. Even the yip yap of the pretentious gallery idiots leave a vacant space that I long to fill. Good friends and inspiration are minimal here, in the Sunshine State, and to have been at my friend's wedding I felt as though a great thirst had been quenched and a long awaited reflection and motivation had come at last.


Art. At one point in my life the creation of art was a romantic and emotional well. I could create my pieces and pour my soul into them, capturing a piece of myself for all to see. While few, or maybe none, understood what they were seeing, it was there. My emotions and perceptions captured in two dimensions, unclothed and unedited.

As I progressed, through college and after college, I was taught that a professional artist will calm this kind of expression in exchange for the craft of an object. To explain this further, a professional artist must be able to communicate fully with his/her audience and create a piece that is both coherent and masterfully crafted. A work of art must be clean and polished unless a tarnish is well intended. Any high school kid, battled with emotions, can draw a picture to release their inner conflict. An artist must do more.


This idea led to a great conflict in me. On one hand I wanted to be a great artist, I wanted to prefect what I do and take my talent to a higher level. On the other hand, taking romanticism out of my work was to give up the most important element. My conflict was first illustrated in the early paintings of garbage, and later illustrated in the creation of Crateart. For example, Crateart was a humorous form of anti-art done in mediums that are not considered high art, on subjects with no reverence, with no meaning, and no romanticism. All the pieces were well crafted, visually stunning, but purposefully empty. The message was as if to say, "If my emotions are not welcome in my art then here, have nothing at all. I will make the prettiest kitsch possible."



So here I am again considering making art. Many times I have tried starting to make new body of work and every time I have just quit. To my dishonor, I admit that I have been lazy. Too many video games, too much television, too many distractions. But the pressing issue has always been the same: Now what? What do I make 2000 miles from my nearest friend or family member? Who is it I am trying to impress with my ideas and my creations? what possible purpose does my artwork serve now with a child and a family, a car, a cat, a garage, and a swimming pool? Do I play the game of the professional artist, and crate marketable work or do I ignore the idea of professional progression and create work that is personal and therapeutic? (note: I realize I said art therapy)


My friend Noel once wrote a story about "Dave Winfield", the rooftop outfielder. Dave Winfield fell off a three story building and lived. He had a crooked walk and sore temper. He slept on his table-saw after drinking himself to sleep each night, while the toxic dust of the concrete grinder seeped into his rooftop, tree-fort, home. He was the romantic artist, suffering his life away for his work. I mention Winfield because I see two kinds of artists. There are the Dave Winfields, the Jackson Polllocks and the Jason Szallas, the mad scientists who invite demons into their lives so they can exercise them onto canvas. The Winfields create work that rarely sells, they exist in a world where only they are right and everyone else is under the influence of illusions. Their reverse are the Jamalis and the Steven Assels, the highly refined phonies. They are the sell-outs who work from 9am to 5pm making pretty pictures for anyone who will buy them. Crateart was a parody of this manner of art, emotionally empty and well crafted. The High Refined Phonies usually do rather well with their work or change professions early on. They can tell you long tales about the meta-physical meaning behind their work, how the work is deeply personal to them, yet they will forget what year the piece was made and have to reference the title on the back. To this type of artist, art is business and the galleries (institutes of money, not culture) embrace them for it.


My conflict is that I hate the Phonies, which is to say I hate the art market. Hate hate hate hate hate. Yet I do not have the courage to be a Winfield. To be a Winfield is to dedicate your entire life to the passion of drama and misery, to be always unappreciated and misunderstood, and to watch the Phonies succeed by pretending to be you.


In my head I hear my mother telling me that I am too dramatic, that I cannot place the entire art world into two groups and believe that I must choose one or the other. So my response to her voice will be that I perceive it that way, and right or wrong I see little other option but to choose one faction or the other if I wish to progress as a professional artist. I would also add to her, and to others, that this opinion does not come uneducated.



So today I bought a journal, a black journal. Every phase in my life since I was 20 years old has begun with a new journal. Its symbolic to me I suppose. I am going to wipe the table clean of half finished work that no longer appeals to me and, once again, begin fresh. I am going to starve myself of my distractions for as long as I can go without them. I will stare at the blank pages and the blank substratum and draw my hand, or my son, or my cat, or a boat, or a plant, anything until I can answer or ignore these conflicts in my head. My instinct is to return, not to Crateart, but to a much older body of work I left in Oklahoma, before I moved to NYC. I'm not sure what I will do, but now is the time to do it. At my friend's wedding the best man, Bill Greezyfingers, made a toast saying that every person exists in a swirling infinity as a morsel in time and space. I can't spend my precious time playing video games and watching television any longer. I have a romantic urge to create art, I always have. Whatever I make will be called art, even if I am the only one who understands it and the rest of the world is wrong.

1 Comments:

At 2:47 PM, Blogger homelesshero said...

I'm glad to hear it.We need more people in this world like you.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home